It was exceedingly difficult to sum up a complex, six-month project in the 2,000 words Wired.com allotted. As such, there were several themes left undeveloped. Due to the same space constraints, I was also unable to relate the various heroics that went into snatching (a qualified) victory from the jaws of defeat. It's easy enough to dispense with both of these tasks at the same time, as there's much overlap between the two.
Crowdsourcing projects are generally characterized as being the product of a few super-contributors and a mass of people who contribute some minor bits. I've heard this called the "dirty little secret of open source," the fact that most of the heavy lifting is done, not by the crowd per se, but by a few select individuals from within the crowd. I'd like to posit another rule: Any crowdsourcing project must install one go-to guy (or girl) who will thanklessly toil day and night to keep the project on the rails. At a magazine this person is called the Production Manager. On Assignment Zero he was called David Cohn.
It is no exaggeration to say that Assignment Zero would have never launched, must less reached completion, without David. Saddled with the totally inadequate title of "associate editor," in reality David did everything from customize Drupal for us, play Webmaster, manage the content on the site and play point person for a wide variety of volunteers and contributors. It's no accident that contributor after contributor emailed me to tell me how much they loved working with him. "The great thing about David isn't that he'll take on all the dirty jobs and work all night to get them done," Lauren Sandler said to me several weeks into the project. "It's that he never plays the martyr. He's all walk, no talk." David is not motivated by laurels and glory, but he deserves both, in spades. (Full disclosure: David is my writing and research assistant on the crowdsourcing book. I'm lucky to have him.)
Another concept that by all rights should have been more fleshed out in the Wired.com piece was the importance of community. While I'd like to think this idea suffuses the piece, I could probably have been more explicit in noting its importance to making AZ productive. Lucky for us, our organizers, Tish Grier and Amanda Michel, understood this to a degree that the rest of us did not.
There was a crucial turning point when a rift opened up between the journalist types (myself included) on one side and Amanda and Tish on the other. They felt our volunteer editors had to play community manager, going out and soliciting contributors, keeping people engaged, holding a few hands. Us hard-bitten journos essentially snorted in disdain. Editors do not play cheerleader, and God knows they do not do outreach. We won the battle and, in doing so, contributed to losing the war. The plain fact is that in the future, journalists will have to develop these skills if they want to succeed in a future in which their readers are also their writers.
The crowd does not contribute in a vacuum. They do so as part of a community of other contributors. I see this again and again in researching my book and, no surprise, it was true with Assignment Zero as well. Tish has written an excellent distillation of how this went down at Assignment Zero, and I'd suggest anyone serious about crowdsourcing and journalism experiments put it on their summer reading list.
After reading the many links and conclusions/comments regarding the AZ project the complexity and profundity of the process becomes much clearer.
I suspect that those close to the action are unwilling to blow their horns too loudly. Their proximity to the project, the dust has yet to settle, might make an assessment of some of the salient points difficult.
Journalism and CS aside, the process and resulting content created a very unique set of experiences, both individually and collectively.
As a ground breaking exercise the AZ project, from a process point of view, must have provided much food for thought and an unequivocal portal into just what might be needed for any future attempts to fashion a community from both a crowd and a concept!
I suspect that both individual and collective destinies, as esoteric as that might sound, have been shaped by the journey and the outcomes could be very far reaching.
This is why I see the project as an unqualified success. Not pretty, might not have reached all the journalistic objectives but an incredible foundation of experiences for future CS/journalistic initiatives.
The myriad elements that make “a healthy community” are difficult to quantify. The most important ones are mostly invisible and not easily identifiable but consist of more ethereal elements like intention, commitment and more importantly biographical association. The “application/adoption” of a concept, unless created organically from within the community, is akin to a blood infusion with the hope that the blood type works out!
I believe the collective intention and commitment to the project by so many dedicated individuals has created a reservoir of substance that will be drawn upon by many for a long time!
Cheers, Alan.
Posted by: Alan | July 18, 2007 at 08:55 AM
After reading the many links and conclusions/comments regarding the AZ project the complexity and profundity of the process becomes much clearer.
I suspect that those close to the action are unwilling to blow their horns too loudly. Their proximity to the project, the dust has yet to settle, might make an assessment of some of the salient points difficult.
Journalism and CS aside, the process and resulting content created a very unique set of experiences, both individually and collectively.
As a ground breaking exercise the AZ project, from a process point of view, must have provided much food for thought and an unequivocal portal into just what might be needed for any future attempts to fashion a community from both a crowd and a concept!
I suspect that both individual and collective destinies, as esoteric as that might sound, have been shaped by the journey and the outcomes could be very far reaching.
This is why I see the project as an unqualified success. Not pretty, might not have reached all the journalistic objectives but an incredible foundation of experiences for future CS/journalistic initiatives.
The myriad elements that make “a healthy community” are difficult to quantify. The most important ones are mostly invisible and not easily identifiable but consist of more ethereal elements like intention, commitment and more importantly biographical association. The “application/adoption” of a concept, unless created organically from within the community, is akin to a blood infusion with the hope that the blood type works out!
I believe the collective intention and commitment to the project by so many dedicated individuals has created a reservoir of substance that will be drawn upon by many for a long time!
Cheers, Alan.
Posted by: Alan | July 18, 2007 at 08:55 AM
this post is very interesting and very useful information about The Importance of Community!! thansk
Posted by: buy viagra | February 05, 2010 at 09:42 AM
i like this part of the post:Crowdsourcing projects are generally characterized as being the product of a few super-contributors and a mass of people who contribute some minor bits. I've heard this called the "dirty little secret of open source," the fact that most of the heavy lifting is done, not by the crowd per se, but by a few select individuals from within the crowd.
Posted by: generic propecia | April 23, 2010 at 02:46 PM
No man is an island... we all are interdependent.Although there certainly are people who don't want to complied to rules, admitted in society
Posted by: Buy Discount Cigarettes | April 27, 2010 at 03:10 AM
Thansk for this information
Posted by: How to loose weight | May 12, 2010 at 08:34 AM
You would think people would wake-up after that one, but no -- they keep looking for that pot of gold that will send them to Hawaii for the rest of their lives.
Posted by: guanacaste costa rica | July 18, 2010 at 11:37 AM
I like this part of the post:Crowdsourcing projects are generally characterized as being the product of a few super-contributors and a mass of people who contribute some minor bits. I've heard this called the "dirty little secret of open source," the fact that most of the heavy lifting is done, not by the crowd per se, but by a few select individuals from within the crowd.
Posted by: Epi Leather | July 22, 2010 at 01:19 AM
Projects are generally characterized as being the product of a few super-contributors and a mass of people who contribute some minor bits. I've heard this called the "dirty little secret of open source," the fact that most of the heavy lifting is done, not by the crowd per se, but by a few select individuals from within the crowd.
Posted by: viagra online | September 09, 2010 at 09:51 AM
Usually community refers to a group of people living in a common geographical location.We share our work and this division of work leads to our dependency on other people working in different roles. In a community people live by associating with one another. The feeling of association is a common human feeling.
Posted by: generic viagra 100mg | October 26, 2010 at 11:11 PM
I agree wit hyou all and also think that it is very important!
Posted by: ambien | November 07, 2010 at 05:28 AM
I had been searching on google for blogs regarding fitness and biking when this post showed up in the final results. Although not really what I was looking for it was really worth the read and for that I would give it four stars.
Posted by: Bicycle Trailers | November 21, 2010 at 06:31 PM
And you base your "this is dangerous" statement on what, exactly? Medical or scientific proof? Or your own unfounded fears and ignorance? As far as I am aware, there has not been a single instance of a tourist getting sick from drinking Masai cow blood.
Posted by: viagra online | December 07, 2010 at 09:14 AM
You are so generous! I just love finding beautiful and artistic freebies like this. They really brighten up my day, thank you!
Posted by: no nonsense muscle building review | December 23, 2010 at 09:19 AM
Hi there I appreciated your post. I feel that it’s important when talking about diabetes to at least mention natural treatments that have been proven to be efficient in controlling high blood glucose. Various natural herbs can be including in a diabetics regimen that will help maintain a healthy glucose level.
Posted by: caverta | December 29, 2010 at 12:51 AM
Community is definitely important, but building one is much easier said than done.
Posted by: Magnetic Generator | December 31, 2010 at 08:27 PM
Being in community feels awesome and near to your homeland but at the same time being judged makes you stay away.
Posted by: snoring solutions | January 15, 2011 at 09:56 AM
You have talked about issued that are debatable in a very subtle manner and informative way…good. How did you manage to do this is a big question. You have inspired me to work harder now.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | January 17, 2011 at 10:05 PM
I am simply out of words after reading your blog. I want to appreciate the way you handled such a complicated subject. Nothing better than this could be written in such a simple manner! Hats off dude!!!
Posted by: kamagra | January 24, 2011 at 10:21 PM
I am thoroughly convinced in this said post. I am currently searching for ways in which I could enhance my knowledge in this said topic you have posted here. It does help me a lot knowing that you have shared this information here freely. I love the way the people here interact and shared their opinions too. I would love to track your future posts pertaining to the said topic we are able to read.
Posted by: Penis Enlargement | January 27, 2011 at 12:46 PM
Wow,Nice one,
There are many people searching about that now they will find enough sources by your tips.
Now looking forward for more tips about that
Posted by: Generic Cialis | January 28, 2011 at 09:52 PM
Wow,Nice one,
There are many people searching about that now they will find enough sources by your tips.
Now looking forward for more tips about that
Posted by: Generic Cialis | January 28, 2011 at 09:52 PM
To make an airplane contrail, you need water and some kind of microscopic particle for the water to condense around.
Posted by: air jordan shoes | February 14, 2011 at 06:05 PM
Interesting theme, thanks for this information.
Posted by: Download mp3 | March 01, 2011 at 02:32 PM
When you say the crowd contributes as part of a community of other contributers I think, of course they do they are a "crowd" wouldn't the word crowd automatically imply that there are several contributers?
Posted by: Timeshare Maintenance Fees Tax Deductible | May 09, 2011 at 08:21 PM