As I noted in my previous post, Assignment Zero will be producing feature stories on a reduced number of topics. In true crowdsourcing fashion, our contributors made this decision for us. If there's one similarity among all crowdsourcing models, it's that you do not control your contributors. That's the tacit contract in crowdsourcing: The crowdsourcer can't delegate work. It can only provide opportunities. The crowd decides the rest.
I can't exactly argue with the crowd's verdict, and in most cases I agree with it. We've had tremendous response to a handful of subjects, including the creation of Citizendium (we recently published the resulting article on Wired.com); and crowdsourcing in the novel, journalism and film. Clearly there's a thread to be teased out here. People get enthusiastic about culture, and how participatory technologies are changing the way it's produced and distributed. Likewise the topic of crowdsourcing in religion has drawn thoughtful, insightful reportage, and this too is understandable and to be applauded. I look forward to the results from all these projects.
But that said, I fear we're being forced to discard a few topics that I view as indispensable to any exploration of this phenomenon. Chief among these lacunae is the rise of the microstock industry. Stock photography has been irrevocably changed by the emergence of cheap, royalty-free photography, much of it shot by amateurs and sold through the so-called "microstock" agencies. Microstock undercuts its traditional stock photo competitors by well over 90 percent, and comprises, as far as I can tell, the most mature development of a crowdsourcing model in any industry. Anyone interested in how user-generated content is going to transform mass media needs to pay serious attention to the roiling waters in the photography world.
I know that a lot of photographers subscribe to my feed, or check this blog out regularly, and I'm hoping a few of you will agree with me and decide to contribute. We need people to interview key players involved with iStockPhoto, Fotolia, and ShutterStock, et. al. in an effort to determine how these companies have helped transform the world of stock photography. Who else should we interview? Are you ready to take some time to pitch in and increase our coverage of micostock houses? Let the editors of Assignment zero know here.
I know this subject inspires considerable passion (and divisiveness) in the photography community. This is your chance to transfer some of that passion into a researched, widely read and hopefully influential work of journalism.
The photographer Thomas Hawk, I really like his photos
http://thomashawk.com/ is CEO of http://beta.zooomr.com/home
Zooomr is a photo sharing application focused on helping you explore photos from the inside out no matter what language you speak.
Cheers, Alan
Posted by: Alan | May 07, 2007 at 09:50 AM
Wikimedia Commons - http://commons.wikimedia.org/ - lots of photos, all under a free-content license. The only thing stopping it from doing to Getty what Wikipedia did to Britannica is (a) the search sucks (b) no good tagging or categorisation system - at the moment it's 1,000,000+ photos in a big pile. We do realise this is awful ...
Posted by: David Gerard | May 08, 2007 at 06:29 AM
Obviously, I am down with the iStockPhoto crowd. Let me know if you want me to run an interview or two.
see you in June,
d.
Posted by: dani | May 15, 2007 at 01:45 PM
I know this subject inspires considerable passion (and divisiveness) in the photography community. This is your chance to transfer some of that passion into a researched, widely read and hopefully influential work of journalism.
Posted by: louis vuitton eclipse | September 16, 2011 at 07:24 PM
[url=http://www.ugg-rakuten.com/]ブーツ通販[/url] 、12.I JUST Correct.Weは彼女の第三のタイトルは"一つの笑いのブルースを作ることは"確かに私はそれを感じることのすべての災害を付けた名前です最初はUsually.Theだった実現しなかった場合は省略され結婚は不可能だったに失望させる問題がroom.You'再一定の全域から"楽しい人"、あなたのペットを待っている女の子に助けられつを読み取られwomen.Itできるように面白いと機知に富んだ取得?彼は陽気な証言に、しばしば男性のほとんどpeople.Desire重要な仕事を楽しま示す、あなたのシングルライナーをこぼし優秀な時間を所有するのか?私は"一つ笑わせる"ブルースは、で学ぶこと!打つために誰かの意図のために、あなたがほとんどの人が面白いように設計された個人的なキャラクタ、多くtoo.Soに埋め込むことができる有用な技術であるaid.Thereしたいと思います個々のユーモラスな個人を見つけて - あなた自身の中で垣間見ることが入手し、また、have.Whatは、あなたが本当に真剣にfunny.Whatever膜を得る行う可能性があるユーモアに接続解放どのテクニックの認識を明らかに?正確に誰が?どのような場合?どんな投稿?あなたがすぐにアイテムを感じることができるように、あなたが無知な発見何のパターンのためにオフに開始し、その人の"ユーモアの人格を"appears.Locatingの全員を持っているだけで何だろう"彼女の笑いを作る"ブルースを停止する第1フェーズとなります。
Posted by: クラシックアーガイルニットuggの | October 18, 2011 at 08:45 PM